




Last Updated: November 2025
Reading Time: 9 minutes
Author: Papacko Content Team
A customer spills hot coffee in their car. Understanding the paper cup lids helps.They blame your cafe. The lid popped off during normal handling because it didn’t fit properly.
Paper cup lids seem simple until you face spill complaints, liability concerns, or discover your “universal” lids don’t actually fit all your cup sizes. Choosing the right lids involves understanding seal mechanisms (friction fit vs snap-on vs plug-in), material safety at hot temperatures, drinking aperture design for customer experience, and compatibility with your specific cup rim dimensions. A poorly matched lid-cup system creates 5-12% spill complaint rates. A well-matched system drops that below 1%.
In this guide, you’ll learn:
•Lid types and seal mechanisms for spill prevention
•Material comparison: PS vs PP vs fiber-based lids
•Temperature tolerance and safety standards
•Seal quality testing and compatibility verification
•Drinking opening designs and customer preferences
•Real pricing across lid types and volumes
•Supplier vetting for quality and consistency
Quick Takeaway: For hot takeaway coffee, dome lids with cross-slot sip opening provide best spill prevention and customer experience. Material: PP (polypropylene) for heat tolerance up to 100°C and microwave safety. Critical spec: Lid diameter must match cup rim within ±2mm for proper seal. Standard sizes: 80mm (8oz-12oz), 90mm (12oz-16oz), 90mm (16oz-20oz). FOB pricing: $0.018-0.045 per lid depending on material and features. Typical MOQ: 50,000 units. Always test seal quality with hot liquid and simulate transport conditions before large orders.
For available paper cup lids, focus on:
Flat Lids (Lowest Profile):
•Design: Flat top with small drinking opening
•Height: 3-5mm above cup rim
•Pros: Minimal height (stackable for delivery), lowest material cost
•Cons: Limited sip comfort, no splash protection, easy to accidentally press and spill
•Best for: Cold drinks, smoothies, iced coffee (where spill risk lower)
•Cost: $0.018-0.028 per lid
Dome Lids (Most Common for Hot Drinks):
•Design: Raised dome creating headspace above liquid
•Height: 8-15mm above cup rim
•Pros: Splash protection (liquid doesn’t contact lid), sip comfort, room for whipped cream/toppings
•Cons: Slightly higher material cost, takes more storage space
•Best for: Hot coffee, espresso drinks, beverages with toppings
•Cost: $0.024-0.038 per lid
High-Dome Lids (Specialty):
•Design: Tall dome for extra headspace
•Height: 15-25mm above cup rim
•Pros: Maximum topping space (whipped cream, foam), premium appearance
•Cons: Highest cost, most storage space, can be top-heavy
•Best for: Frappuccinos, specialty drinks, dessert beverages
•Cost: $0.032-0.050 per lid
Sipper Lids (Integrated Spout):
•Design: Built-in drinking spout, no separate opening
•Height: Variable
•Pros: No accidental spillage through wrong opening, controlled pour
•Cons: Less comfortable for some users, harder to clean (if reusable)
•Best for: Children’s drinks, meal combos, on-the-go beverages
•Cost: $0.028-0.042 per lid
Understanding secure paper cup lids requires attention to these factors:
Friction Fit (Most Common):
•How it works: Lid rim presses against outside of cup rim, held by friction
•Strength: Moderate (adequate for most uses)
•Requirements: Cup rim must be uniform, lid diameter precisely matched
•Failure mode: Pops off if cup rim deformed or diameter mismatch >2mm
•Application: 80% of disposable lids use this
Snap-On (Secure Lock):
•How it works: Lid features lip that clicks under cup rim edge
•Strength: Strong (resists 3-5× more force than friction fit)
•Requirements: Cup must have proper rim curl, lid must have corresponding groove
•Failure mode: Rarely fails if properly matched, may crack if forced
•Application: Premium cups, travel mugs, spill-sensitive applications
•Cost premium: +25-40% vs friction fit
Plug-In (Insert Style):
•How it works: Lid has downward extension that inserts into cup opening
•Strength: Good for preventing sideways dislodging
•Requirements: Cup interior diameter consistency
•Failure mode: Can be pulled off upward, less secure for hot liquids
•Application: Cold drinks, smoothies, less common for hot coffee
Hybrid (Friction + Snap Features):
•How it works: Combines friction grip with partial snap features
•Strength: Better than friction alone, not as secure as full snap-on
•Application: Mid-range quality coffee cups
•Cost premium: +10-20% vs basic friction
The key to choosing common paper cup lids depends on:
Cross-Slot (Most Popular):
•Design: Crossed cuts creating four flaps that fold back
•Pros: Easy to open with thumb, self-closing reduces spills, comfortable sip
•Cons: Can tear if pulled too hard
•Best for: Hot coffee, tea, standard beverages
Tear-Tab:
•Design: Perforated section tears away completely
•Pros: Large opening (better flow), won’t re-close accidentally
•Cons: Cannot re-seal, higher spill risk if knocked
•Best for: Iced drinks, customers who prefer wide opening
Hinged Flap:
•Design: Attached flap that lifts up and snaps closed
•Pros: Reusable-style experience, tight seal when closed
•Cons: More complex (higher cost), hinge can break
•Cost: +30-50% vs cross-slot
Straw Slot:
•Design: Pre-cut X or circle for straw insertion
•Pros: Straw stays in place, prevents spills
•Cons: Requires straw, opening too small for drinking without straw
•Best for: Iced coffee, smoothies, bubble tea
Reclosable Slider:
•Design: Sliding mechanism opens/closes drinking port
•Pros: Best spill prevention, reusable-quality experience
•Cons: Most expensive, complex manufacturing
•Cost: +80-120% vs cross-slot
•Best for: Premium brands, travel scenarios
Understanding various paper cup lids requires attention to these factors:
What It Is: Rigid plastic made from styrene monomer, most economical option
Performance Characteristics:
•Temperature tolerance: Up to 85°C (185°F) – adequate for most coffee
•Rigidity: Excellent (holds shape, doesn’t deform)
•Clarity: Can be clear or opaque (white most common)
•Seal quality: Good with proper cup match
•Microwave-safe: No (can melt or release chemicals)
•Recyclable: Technically yes (#6) but rarely accepted by recycling facilities
Environmental Considerations:
•❌ Made from petroleum
•❌ Persists in environment (decades if not recycled)
•❌ Facing bans in many jurisdictions (Seattle, San Francisco, etc.)
•❌ contaminates recycling due to food residue
Cost: $0.018-0.028 per lid (lowest cost option)
Best For: Budget operations, regions without PS bans, short-term business planning (likely to be phased out)
Key Limitation: Cannot handle boiling water (100°C), softens and may deform
For different paper cup lids, focus on:
What It Is: Thermoplastic polymer, more heat-tolerant than PS
Performance Characteristics:
•Temperature tolerance: Up to 120°C (248°F) – handles boiling water
•Rigidity: Excellent (slightly more flexible than PS, less brittle)
•Clarity: Translucent to opaque (varies by formulation)
•Seal quality: Excellent (retains shape at high temperatures)
•Microwave-safe: Yes (tested and certified)
•Recyclable: Yes (#5) – better facility acceptance than PS
Environmental Considerations:
•⚠️ Made from petroleum
•⚠️ Recyclable but actual rates low (food contamination)
•✅ More durable = less likely to crack and create microplastic fragments
•✅ Not facing widespread bans (unlike PS)
Cost: $0.024-0.038 per lid (20-35% premium vs PS)
Best For: Hot beverages, microwave reheating scenarios, regions with PS bans, long-term sustainable solution (until better alternatives available)
Key Advantage: Heat tolerance eliminates liability risk from lid failure with very hot beverages
Understanding common paper cup lids requires attention to these factors:
What They Are: Made from molded plant fibers (bagasse, bamboo) or PLA bioplastic
Types:
1.Molded Fiber (Bagasse/Bamboo):
– Material: Compressed plant fibers
– Coating: Water-based or PLA for moisture resistance
– Appearance: Opaque, natural texture
– Performance: Good seal, moderate heat tolerance (to 90°C)
2.PLA Plastic:
– Material: Plant-based bioplastic (corn/sugarcane)
– Appearance: Clear or translucent (similar to conventional plastic)
– Performance: Similar to PS (heat tolerance to 85°C)
Performance Characteristics:
•Temperature tolerance: 80-90°C typical (not for boiling water)
•Rigidity: Good (fiber lids can be slightly thicker for strength)
•Seal quality: Good to excellent (depending on manufacturing precision)
•Microwave-safe: oftenPLA softens, fiber coating may fail)
•Compostable: Industrial facilities (BPI certified) or home (some fiber with water coating)
Environmental Considerations:
•✅ Made from renewable/waste resources
•✅ Industrially or home compostable (with proper facilities)
•⚠️ PLA still requires industrial composting (not home/landfill)
•⚠️ Contamination concerns (can’t mix with conventional plastic recycling)
Cost: $0.032-0.050 per lid (60-120% premium vs PS)
Best For: Eco-conscious brands, markets with composting infrastructure, regulatory compliance (banned plastic lid jurisdictions)
Key Limitation: Lower heat tolerance eliminates use for very hot beverages or microwave reheating
The key to choosing available paper cup lids depends on:
When evaluating standard paper cup lids, consider the following:
Coffee Brewing and Serving Temperatures:
•Drip coffee brewed: 90-96°C (194-205°F)
•Espresso extraction: 88-96°C (190-205°F)
•Served to customer: 70-85°C (158-185°F) usoften Safe drinking temp: 60-65°C (140-149°F)
Lid Performance Requirements:
•Must remain rigid at serving temperature (70-85°C)
•Should not deform or soften during 30-60 minute hold
•Must not release chemicals (FDA food contact compliance)
•Seal integrity maintained throughout cooling process
When evaluating paper cup lids, consider the following:
FDA 21 CFR 177.1520 (PP Contact with Food):
•Migration testing at high temperatures
•Extractables analysis
•Chemical composition verification
•Long-term stability testing
ASTM F2643 (Lid Fit Testing):
•Seal force measurement
•Leak testing under pressure
•Drop testing with liquid
•Temperature cycling resistance
ISO 9001 (Manufacturing Quality):
•Consistent dimensions (diameter ±0.5mm tolerance)
•Uniform thickness
•Defect rate <0.5%
•Batch consistency verification
When evaluating various paper cup lids, consider the following:
Key Insight: Only PP lids safely handle boiling water (100°C). For typical coffee service (70-85°C), all materials adequate, but PP provides safety margin.
Understanding secure paper cup lids requires attention to these factors:
Burn Risk from Lid Failure:
•Lid pops off → hot liquid spills → customer burn injury
•Restaurant liability: Product defect vs user error determination
•Insurance implications: Premium increases if repeated incidents
•Legal precedent: Establishments held liable for inadequate lids
Risk Mitigation Strategies:
1.Use PP lids (heat tolerance exceeds coffee temperature by 30-40°C)
2.Test seal quality rigorously before rollout
3.Train staff on proper lid application (audible snap/click)
4.Use warning labels (“Caution: Hot” on cup or lid)
5.Document supplier certifications (FDA compliance — testing reports)
6.Maintain incident log (track any spills, identify patterns)
For common paper cup lids, focus on:
Cup Rim Diameter:
•Measured at top edge where lid contacts
•Variance: ±1-2mm typical in manufacturing
•Critical: Lid must accommodate this variance
Lid Inner Diameter:
•Must be 1-3mm smaller than cup rim (friction fit)
•Too tight: Difficult to apply, may crack lid
•Too loose: Pops off easily, poor seal
Rim Curl/Flange:
•Snap-on lids require outward curl on cup rim
•Curl depth: 2-4mm typical
•Lid groove must match curl depth
Standard Sizes:
•80mm (3.15″): Fits 8oz, 10oz, 12oz cups (small/medium)
•90mm (3.54″): Fits 12oz, 16oz cups (medium/large) – most common
•90mm (3.54″): Also fits 20oz cups (different height, same rim)
For compatible paper cup lids, focus on:
Phase 1: Static Seal Test
1.Fill cup with hot water (80-85°C) to 80% capacity
2.Apply lid firmly (as trained staff would)
3.Invert cup for 30 seconds over paper towel
4.Check for leaking
Pass: No drips
Fail: Any moisture on towel
Phase 2: Dynamic Transport Test
1.Fill cup with hot water (80-85°C) to 90% capacity (overfill scenario)
2.Secure lid
3.Place in cup holder or bag
4.Simulate car ride: gentle shaking, turns, stops (5 minutes)
5.Check for lid retention and leaking
Pass: Lid stays firmly attached, no leaking
Fail: Lid loosens or pops off, leaking occurs
Phase 3: Drop Test
1.Fill cup with hot water to 70% capacity
2.Secure lid
3.Drop from 12 inches (30cm) onto flat surface
4.Check lid retention and leaking
Pass: Lid remains attached, no spills
Fail: Lid pops off or leaks develop
Phase 4: Extended Hold Test
1.Fill cup with hot coffee (actual beverage, not water)
2.Secure lid
3.Leave undisturbed for 60 minutes
4.Check seal integrity, drink through opening
Pass: Seal intact, comfortable drinking experience
Fail: Lid loosened, seal compromised, drinking difficult
When evaluating cup lids, consider the following:
Lid Pops Off During Transport:
•Cause: Diameter mismatch (lid too large), insufficient friction
•Solution: Verify lid and cup from same manufacturer/specifications, test with actual cup samples
Leaking from Drinking Opening:
•Cause: Opening too large, poor cross-slot design
•Solution: Choose lids with tighter cross-slot or reclosable feature
Leaking at Lid-Rim Interface:
•Cause: Cup rim deformation, liquid trapped between lid and rim
•Solution: Don’t overfill (leave 5-10mm headspace), ensure rim is clean/dry before lidding
Lid Cracks When Applied:
•Cause: Lid too small (forced onto cup), brittle material (PS in cold conditions)
•Solution: Verify diameter match, store lids at room temperature (not cold storage)
Lid Deforms from Heat:
•Cause: Material heat tolerance exceeded
•Solution: Use PP lids for hot beverages, verify temperature tolerance specifications
For the paper cup lids, focus on:
Base Scenario: Standard dome lid, cross-slot opening, 50,000 unit MOQ
Add-Ons:
•Custom logo printing: +$0.004-0.008 per lid
•Color tinting (vs white): +$0.002-0.004
•Smaller MOQ (25,000): +20-30% premium
•High-dome design: +$0.006-0.012 vs standard dome
•Certification documentation (BPI, FDA): Included (verified suppliers)
Understanding compatible paper cup lids requires attention to these factors:
Key Insight: Doubling order from 50k to 100k reduces per-lid cost by 15%. Shipping cost per unit drops by 33%.
The key to choosing secure paper cup lids depends on:
Small Cafe (100 hot drinks/day, 300 days/year = 30,000 lids):
Medium Cafe Chain (5 locations, 500 drinks/day, 300 days/year = 150,000 lids):
Takeaway: Lids represent 0.4-1.1% of drink price. Upgrading to premium features adds $0.006-0.022 per drink – minimal customer impact.
The key to choosing the paper cup lids depends on:
1. Match Lid Size to Cup Range:
•One 90mm lid fits 12oz — 16oz, and 20oz cups
•Avoid stocking multiple lid sizes (dilutes order volume)
•Standardize cup rim diameter across your cup sizes
2. Balance Quality and Cost:
•Use premium PP lids for hot drinks (liability protection)
•Use budget PS/PLA lids for cold drinks (lower risk)
•Reserve premium features (reclosable) for large sizes only
3. Buy Lids Separately from Cups:
•Don’t bundle (often frequently% premium for bundles)
•Source lids from specialist (better pricing than cup manufacturer)
•Ensure compatibility through testing
4. Leverage Volume Commitments:
•Commit to 6-12 month supply (locks in pricing)
•Negotiate better terms for consistent monthly orders
•Some suppliers offer consignment (pay as used)
Understanding secure paper cup lids requires attention to these factors:
1. Material and Specifications:
•What material are your lids made from? (Request exact resin type)
•What’s the temperature tolerance range?
•Are lids FDA-approved for food contact? (Request certificate)
•What’s the wall thickness? (Thicker = more rigid but more expensive)
•What’s your typical dimensional tolerance? (±0.5mm acceptable)
2. Compatibility and Testing:
•Can you provide compatibility chart with major cup brands?
•Do you have seal testing reports? (Leak, drop, transport tests)
•Can you send samples compatible with our specific cups? (Provide cup specs)
•What’s your defect rate? (<0.5% acceptable)
3. Certifications and Compliance:
•Food contact safety certification? (FDA 21 CFR 177.1520 for PP)
•BPI or OK Compost certification? (If claiming compostable)
•Microwave-safe testing documentation? (If claimed)
•ISO 9001 or similar quality management?
4. Business Terms:
•Standard MOQ? (Negotiable for first order?)
•Lead time? (Production + shipping)
•Payment terms? (30/70 common)
•Sample policy? (Should be free or nominal)
•Defect replacement policy? (Clear terms essential)
5. Consistency and Support:
•How do you ensure batch-to-batch consistency?
•Do you maintain inventory or produce-to-order?
•Can you accommodate mixed orders? (Different lid types/sizes)
•Do you have US/EU distribution? (Faster shipping, lower cost)
For cup lids, focus on:
Vague Temperature Specifications:
•❌ “Suitable for hot drinks” without °C/°F specification
•Why: Critical safety spec must be precise
No Compatibility Information:
•❌ Can’t specify which cup sizes/brands lids fit
•Why: Indicates lack of testing or poor quality control
Won’t Provide Samples:
•❌ Refuses samples or charges excessive fees
•Why: Legitimate suppliers provide samples confidently
Unusually Low Pricing:
•❌ 30-40% below market rates
•Why: Thinner material, poor tolerances, or safety shortcuts
No FDA/Safety Documentation:
•❌ Can’t provide food contact safety certificates
•Why: May use non-food-grade materials (liability risk)
High Defect Tolerance:
•❌ States defect rates >1% are normal
•Why: Professional manufacturers achieve <0.5%
The key to choosing the paper cup lids depends on:
Order Sufficient Samples:
•Request 100-200 lids (enough for comprehensive testing)
•Test with your actual cup inventory (not generic samples)
Dimensional Verification:
•Measure lid diameter with caliper (verify matches specifications)
•Check for uniform thickness
•Inspect drinking opening (clean cuts, no rough edges)
Seal Testing (As described in earlier section):
•Static leak test
•Dynamic transport test
•Drop test
•Extended hold test
Real-World Pilot:
•Use samples for actual customer orders (50-100 drinks)
•Gather staff feedback (ease of application, customer comments)
•Track: spill incidents, fit issues, customer complaints
Documentation:
•Photograph any failures
•Record failure rates and modes
•Compare multiple suppliers side-by-side
Understanding secure paper cup lids requires attention to these factors:
Challenge: Using PS lids with 12oz and 16oz cups. Complaint rate 8% (lids popping off — especially in winter cold). Previous supplier inconsistent dimensions.
Solution: Switched to PP dome lids with snap-on feature. Worked with new supplier to test compatibility with specific cup brand. Trained staff on proper application (audible click confirmation).
Results:
•Lid cost: Increased from $0.022 to $0.034 per lid (+55%)
•Annual cost impact: +$540 (45,000 lids/year)
•Complaint rate: Dropped from 8% to 0.4% (20× improvement)
•Customer retention: Estimated 12% improvement (fewer negative experiences)
•Staff confidence: Higher (knew lids would hold)
•Liability: Zero spill incidents in 12 months (vs 2-3/year previously)
Key Lesson: Premium lids prevent complaints and reduce liability. Cost increase negligible compared to customer retention value.
For standard paper cup lids, focus on:
Challenge: High volume (500 drinks/day). Environmental mandate requiring compostable packaging. Early fiber lids failed seal tests (leaked).
Solution: Upgraded to PLA lids (better seal performance than initial fiber options tested). Partnered with campus composting program. Clear bin labeling for disposal.
Results:
•Lid cost: $0.036 per lid (vs $0.024 for previous PS)
•Annual cost impact: +$1,800 (150,000 lids/year)
•Composting rate: 76% (good for campus environment with education)
•Sustainability compliance: Met campus mandate
•Student satisfaction: High (visible commitment to sustainability)
•Marketing: Featured in campus sustainability report
Key Lesson: Institutional mandates create necessity. Proper disposal infrastructure critical for compostable lids to fulfill environmental purpose.
Understanding the paper cup lids requires attention to these factors:
Challenge: High spill risk (customers drinking while driving). Using standard friction-fit lids. Insurance premiums increasing due to spill claims.
Solution: Switched to reclosable slider lids for all hot drinks. Emphasized spill prevention in marketing (“Safe for Your Commute”). Trained staff to demonstrate closure feature.
Results:
•Lid cost: Increased from $0.026 to $0.050 per lid (+92%)
•Annual cost impact: +$10,800 (450,000 lids/year)
•Spill claims: Dropped from 15/year to 1/year
•Insurance savings: -$3,200/year (lower premiums)
•Net cost: $7,600/year
•Marketing value: “Spill-proof guarantee” differentiation
•Customer feedback: 88% positive on lid feature
Key Lesson: Premium lids can be marketing differentiator and reduce insurance costs. Total cost analysis includes more than just lid price.
When evaluating proper paper cup lids, consider the following:
Check three specifications: 1) Cup rim diameter (measure with ruler at top edge), 2) Lid inner diameter (should be 1-3mm smaller than cup), 3) Seal mechanism (friction vs snap-on requires different cup rim designs). Always request samples and test with your actual cups before large orders. Generic “universal” lids osometimesdon’t fit perfectly – prioritize lids specifically matched to your cup brand/model.
For secure paper cup lids, focus on:
Yes, but consider material. PP lids work for both (heat-tolerant and safe for cold). PS lids work for both if beverages <85°C. PLA/fiber lids may have temperature limitations (check specs). Practical consideration: Cold drinks don’t need dome (flat lids cheaper), hot drinks benefit from dome (splash protection). Many cafes use dome lids for all to simplify inventory.
The key to choosing cup lids depends on:
Only if properly composted. PLA lids require industrial composting facilities (won’t break down in landfills or home compost). If lids end up in trash, they offer no environmental advantage over conventional plastic. Verify your region has composting facilities accepting BPI-certified items before choosing compostable lids. Exception: Fiber lids with water-based coatings can be home compostable (verify certification).
When evaluating common paper cup lids, consider the following:
Cool, dry, protected from crushing. Stack in original cases (don’t remove until needed). Avoid: direct sunlight (degrades plastics), humidity >60% (affects fiber lids), temperature extremes (PS becomes brittle in cold). Store off ground on pallets or shelving. Rotate stock FIFO (first in, first out). Shelf life: PS/PP 24+ months, PLA 12-18 months, fiber 12-15 months. Don’t overstack (crushing damages seal surfaces).
The key to choosing secure paper cup lids depends on:
Reclosable slider lids (best but expensive: $0.045-0.065/lid). Second best: Dome lids with snap-on seal mechanism ($0.030-0.045/lid). Minimum: Standard dome with good friction fit ($0.024-0.032/lid). Critical: Test lids with transport simulation (shaking, tilting, 30-60 minutes). Avoid flat lids for delivery (higher spill risk). Train drivers to keep beverages upright and secure.
When evaluating the paper cup lids, consider the following:
Geoftenes, but verify. PP lids rated microwave-safe up to 120°C can handle typical microwave reheating (1-2 minutes). However: Cup must also be microwave-safe (not all are). Steam buildup can cause pressure – customer should open lid slightly before microwaving. Some PP lids not tested for microwave despite heat tolerance – request microwave-safe certification if customers commonly reheat.
For standard paper cup lids, focus on:
Five strategies: 1) Choose lids precisely matched to your cups (test rigorously), 2) Train staff on proper application (firm press until seated), 3) Don’t overfill cups (leave 5-10mm headspace), 4) Use appropriate lid type for beverage (dome for hot, consider reclosable for travel), 5) Inspect lids during service (replace any with damage). Track complaints to identify patterns (specific lid-cup combinations, times of day, staff members).
Choosing paper cup lids for takeaway coffee safety requires matching lid specifications to cup dimensions, selecting appropriate materials for beverage temperatures, and prioritizing seal quality to prevent spills and liability. For most coffee shops, PP dome lids with cross-slot openings provide the best balance of safety, customer experience, and cost at 50,000-100,000 annual volumes ($0.026-0.032 per lid).
Quick Decision Framework:
•Hot coffee service (80-90°C): PP dome lids, cross-slot opening
•Very hot beverages (90-100°C): PP only (PS and PLA insufficient)
•Cold drinks + eco-priority: PLA or fiber lids (compostable options)
•Delivery/travel focus: Reclosable slider or snap-on lids (maximum spill prevention)
Always test lids with actual cups and simulate real-world conditions (transport, extended hold times) before large orders. Understanding cup lids helps.Proper lid selection reduces complaint rates from 5-12% to below 1% and virtually eliminates spill-related liability.
Papacko offers paper cup lids in PS, PP, PLA, and fiber materials with dome, flat, and reclosable designs. We provide compatibility testing support and FDA-certified food-contact safe options.
Get Started:
•Request free sample pack (100-200 lids)
•Receive compatibility verification within 24 hours
•Access our lid-cup matching guide
•MOQ from 50,000 units